Research Use Only · Dosing data compiled from published literature · Not for human or veterinary use
Compare

Retatrutide vs Tirzepatide

Two weekly incretin compounds at very different stages of evidence.

The short version

These are not at the same stage of evidence. Tirzepatide is approved with published phase 3 results and a label-defined escalation. Retatrutide is still in phase 3 and approved nowhere — every figure circulating for it traces back to a phase 2 dose-ranging trial.

RetatrutideTirzepatide
What it isLY3437943, triple GIP/GLP-1/glucagon agonistDual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist
Evidence tierClinicalClinical
RouteSubcutaneousSubcutaneous
Half-life~6 days~5 days
Vial sizes10/15/30 mg20/30 mg
Water we suggest1 mL, 1.5 mL, 3 mL1.5 mL, 2 mL
Reported doses1 mg, 4 mg, 6 mg, 8 mg2.5 mg, 5 mg, 7.5 mg, 10 mg
Has a scheduleWeekly 1 mg step-up — most settle at 4–6 mgApproved-label escalation

What the third receptor changes

Tirzepatide is a dual GIP/GLP-1 agonist. Retatrutide adds glucagon-receptor agonism, which raises energy expenditure and drives hepatic fat mobilisation rather than adding more of the same effect. Its tolerability profile is less well characterised simply because less has been published.

The escalation difference is the one you feel

Tirzepatide has a defined schedule from the trials and the label. Retatrutide has no equivalent — its 1/4/8/12 mg figures are trial arms, not a ramp. In practice most people settle at 4–6 mg and stop there.