Research Use Only · Dosing data compiled from published literature · Not for human or veterinary use
Compare

GHK-Cu vs AHK-Cu

Two copper tripeptides with different sequences and very different amounts of published work.

Two routes for AHK-Cu. AHK-Cu can be applied topically in a serum or injected subcutaneously, and the two are not interchangeable. The subcutaneous figures mirror GHK-Cu, the closely related copper tripeptide — there is no AHK-Cu-specific injection trial, so treat them as extrapolated from a structural analogue.

Pick one route and stay on it. The topical route puts the whole vial into a 30 mL serum; the subcutaneous route uses bacteriostatic water and the dose table. See the AHK-Cu page.

The short version

GHK-Cu has decades of cosmetic literature. AHK-Cu has very little. Both bind copper and both are studied topically, but GHK-Cu sits in our clinical tier on the strength of published human cosmetic work, while AHK-Cu is graded limited.

GHK-CuAHK-Cu
What it isCopper tripeptide-1, Gly-His-Lys-CuAlanine-histidine-lysine copper peptide
Evidence tierClinicalLimited
RouteSubcutaneousTopical or subcutaneous
Half-lifeShort systemicallyShort systemically
Vial sizes50/100 mg100 mg
Water we suggest3 mL, 3 mLstandard rule
Reported doses1 mg, 2 mg, 3 mg1 mg, 2 mg
Has a schedulenono

Different sequences, different focus

GHK-Cu is glycyl-histidyl-lysine; AHK-Cu is alanyl-histidyl-lysine. Most AHK-Cu work is in-vitro and hair-follicle focused, which is why it is usually discussed for hair rather than skin.

Both are mostly topical

The published record for both is dominated by topical formulation work rather than systemic administration. Reconstituted injection figures are community convention, not trial doses.