Two copper tripeptides with different sequences and very different amounts of published work.
Pick one route and stay on it. The topical route puts the whole vial into a 30 mL serum; the subcutaneous route uses bacteriostatic water and the dose table. See the AHK-Cu page.
GHK-Cu has decades of cosmetic literature. AHK-Cu has very little. Both bind copper and both are studied topically, but GHK-Cu sits in our clinical tier on the strength of published human cosmetic work, while AHK-Cu is graded limited.
| GHK-Cu | AHK-Cu | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Copper tripeptide-1, Gly-His-Lys-Cu | Alanine-histidine-lysine copper peptide |
| Evidence tier | Clinical | Limited |
| Route | Subcutaneous | Topical or subcutaneous |
| Half-life | Short systemically | Short systemically |
| Vial sizes | 50/100 mg | 100 mg |
| Water we suggest | 3 mL, 3 mL | standard rule |
| Reported doses | 1 mg, 2 mg, 3 mg | 1 mg, 2 mg |
| Has a schedule | no | no |
GHK-Cu is glycyl-histidyl-lysine; AHK-Cu is alanyl-histidyl-lysine. Most AHK-Cu work is in-vitro and hair-follicle focused, which is why it is usually discussed for hair rather than skin.
The published record for both is dominated by topical formulation work rather than systemic administration. Reconstituted injection figures are community convention, not trial doses.